Nealy v. United States
Opinion
Robert Lee Nealy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nealy v. United States, No. 8:05-cv-2933-RBH, 2007 WL 1290262 (D.S.C. Apr.30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert Lee NEALY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; John J. Lamanna, Warden at FCI Edgefield, Respondents—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished