U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Garner v. McMaster

Garner v. McMaster
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 24, 2007

Garner v. McMaster

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6524

TREY GARNER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General for South Carolina; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (0:06-cv-00021-GRA)

Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 24, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Trey Garner, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Trey Garner appeals the district court’s order denying as moot his objections to the report and recommendation filed subsequent to the entry of a final order in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Garner v. McMaster, No. 0:06-cv-00021-GRA (D.S.C. filed Mar. 1, 2007 & entered Mar. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.