Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark
Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1501
SANJEEV MALHOTRA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WATERGATE AT LANDMARK (WAL) CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, WAL Board of Directors and/or its assignees,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:05-cv-00076-LMB)
Submitted: October 12, 2007 Decided: October 23, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sanjeev Malhotra, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Curtis Gartner, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Sanjeev Malhotra appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motions to reopen and for sanctions. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Malhotra v.
Watergate at Landmark Condo. Assoc., No. 1:05-cv-00076-LMB (E.D.
Va. Apr. 4 & 6, 2007). We deny Appellee’s motion for sanctions.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished