U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark

Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 23, 2007

Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1501

SANJEEV MALHOTRA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WATERGATE AT LANDMARK (WAL) CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, WAL Board of Directors and/or its assignees, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:05-cv-00076-LMB)

Submitted: October 12, 2007 Decided: October 23, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sanjeev Malhotra, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Curtis Gartner, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sanjeev Malhotra appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions to reopen and for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark Condo. Assoc., No. 1:05-cv-00076-LMB (E.D.

Va. Apr. 4 & 6, 2007). We deny Appellee’s motion for sanctions.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.