Thomas v. Mullen
Thomas v. Mullen
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1716
RANDY L. THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GRAHAM C. MULLEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00231-FDW)
Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 22, 2007
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Thomas v. Mullen, No. 3:07-cv-00231-FDW
(W.D.N.C. June 19, 2007). We grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished