Young v. Nickols

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Young v. Nickols

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6475

ROBERT E. YOUNG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NEIL COLLIER, Probation Officer; CHRISTOPHER BARDON, Probation Officer,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

RON NICKOLS, Sheriff; OFFICER NETTER; BUCHEAUN; GAY; UNKNOWN OFFICERS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (6:03-cv-3640)

Submitted: October 10, 2007 Decided: October 31, 2007

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert E. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., John Benjamin Aplin, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Robert E. Young appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint and denying

reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Young v. Collier, No. 6:03-cv-

3640 (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2006 & Mar. 23, 2007). Further, we deny

Young’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished