Young v. Nickols
Young v. Nickols
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6475
ROBERT E. YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NEIL COLLIER, Probation Officer; CHRISTOPHER BARDON, Probation Officer,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
RON NICKOLS, Sheriff; OFFICER NETTER; BUCHEAUN; GAY; UNKNOWN OFFICERS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (6:03-cv-3640)
Submitted: October 10, 2007 Decided: October 31, 2007
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert E. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., John Benjamin Aplin, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Robert E. Young appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint and denying
reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Young v. Collier, No. 6:03-cv-
3640 (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2006 & Mar. 23, 2007). Further, we deny
Young’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished