Boger v. Braxton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Boger v. Braxton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7831

SCOTT M. BOGER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

D. A. BRAXTON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-05-543)

Submitted: October 15, 2007 Decided: November 8, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott M. Boger, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Scott M. Boger appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) petition. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Boger v. Braxton,

No. 7:05-cv-00543-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2005). Many of

Boger’s pending motions are moot since he has been given an

opportunity to respond to Appellee’s brief; the remaining motions

are without merit. Thus, we deny all of Boger’s pending motions.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished