Park v. Lim
Opinion
Kyung Hee Park appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging civil violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (2000), et seq. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm for the *608 reasons stated by the district court. See Park v. Lim, No. 1:06-cv-00569-GBL (E.D.Va. May 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Appellees have filed motions to strike Park's reply brief. Because Park's reply brief merely repeats her earlier claims and addresses matters that were not included in her informal brief, we grant Appellees’ motions to strike. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Kyung Hee PARK, A/K/A Maria Kim, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Suk-Ku LIM; New York Life Insurance Company, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished