Hall v. Sapp
Hall v. Sapp
255 F. App'x 760
Hall v. Sapp
Opinion
Vincent John Hall appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Sapp, No. 6:06-cv-02476-RBH, 2007 WL 1462923 (D.S.C. May 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.