United States v. Matthews

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 26, 2007

United States v. Matthews, 255 F. App'x 696 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clinton Stanley Matthews appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Matthews, No. 2:93-cr-00066-HCM, 2007 WL 1983833 (E.D.Va. July 3, 2007). We deny Matthews’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clinton Stanley MATTHEWS, A/K/A Howard L. Eastwood, A/K/A Stanley Matthews, A/K/A Clinton Mallhew, A/K/A William Christopher Hinton, A/K/A Bernard Jones, A/K/A Craig Jerrod Ingram, A/K/A Ian Bernard Matthew, Defendant—Appellant
Status: Unpublished