Anthony Dacre appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dacre v. Clemits, No. 1:07-cv-00166-JCC (E.D.Va. May 18, 2007). Additionally, we deny Dacre’s motions for appointment of counsel and for injunctive relief. We dispense with *611 oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.