Benson v. Hinman
Benson v. Hinman
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1629
NIDELKA BENSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MRS. MARY HINMAN; MRS. GAIL FORD; MRS. CAROL EWING,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00825-REP)
Submitted: November 16, 2007 Decided: December 3, 2007
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nidelka Benson, Appellant Pro Se. Gary M. Nuckols, Andrew Philip Sherrod, HIRSCHLER, FLEISCHER, Richmond, Virginia; Walter Jervis Sheffield, WALTER J. SHEFFIELD, ATTORNEY AT LAW PC, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Nidelka Benson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting
Defendants’ motions to dismiss her complaint brought under the Fair
Labor Standards Act,
29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219(“FLSA”) (West 1998 &
Supp. 2007). We have reviewed the record and find Benson’s
claims, filed more than three years after their accrual, barred by
the FLSA’s statute of limitations. See
29 U.S.C. § 255(a) (1998).
We further find the district court did not abuse its discretion in
refusing to equitably toll the statute of limitations. We
therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal of Benson’s
complaint on this ground. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished