UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6497

WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden, Petersburg Federal Correctional Complex; JOSEPH BROOKS, Former Warden, Petersburg Federal Correctional Complex; JAMES CROSS, Former Acting Warden, FCC Petersburg; CORNELIA JANZEN, Legal Liaison & Administrative Remedy Coordinator, FCC Petersburg; HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; HARRELL WATTS, General Counsel/Administrative Remedy Coordinator, B.O.P.; KIMBERLEY WHITE, Mid- Atlantic Region Admin. Remedy Coordinator, B.O.P.; DENISE M. GOTTLIEB, Mid-Atlantic Region Admin. Remedy Coordinator, B.O.P., D. PARKER, Unit Manager, FCC Petersburg Medium; MR. CRENELL, Counselor, Petersburg FCC Medium; DOCTOR LAYBOURNE, M.D., Petersburg FCC; PHYSICIAN’S ASSISTANCE PANAGUITON, P.A. at Petersburg FCC; J. FAJARDO, P.A. at Petersburg FCC; P.A. NEGRON, P.A. or Former P.A. at Petersburg FCC; MR. WYRICK, Unit Manager, Lee Hall, Petersburg FCC; M. T. HARDING, Case Manager, Lee Hall, Petersburg FCC; M. C. SPEIGHTS, Counselor, Lee Hall, Petersburg FCC; MR. WHEELER, Counselor, Lee Hall, Petersburg FCC; JANET MORRIS, Supervisor of Education, Petersburg FCC, DAWN RANKE, Former Associate Warden for Programming, Petersburg FCC Low; LIEUTENANT DESROCHES, Petersburg FCC Low; OFFICER BLEVINS, Corrections Officer Petersburg FCC; LORRAINE HILL, Secretary, BOP; ANNETTE BAILEY, Secretary, BOP; OFFICER MILLEMAC, C.O., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00501-TSE)

Submitted: October 31, 2007 Decided: December 11, 2007

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Henry Harrison, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

William Henry Harrison appeals the district court’s

orders: (1) dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his

complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

(1971); and (2) denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Harrison v. Adams, No. 1:06-cv-00501-TSE

(E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2007; filed Mar. 19, 2007, entered Mar. 20,

2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -