Sneed v. Jackson
Sneed v. Jackson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6652
COREY T. SNEED,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RICK JACKSON,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-hc-02099-BO)
Submitted: November 6, 2007 Decided: December 10, 2007
Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Corey T. Sneed, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Corey T. Sneed appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to resubmit his
28 U.S.C. § 2254(2000) petition. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Sneed v. Jackson, No. 5:06-hc-02099-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr.
10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished