U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Snipe

United States v. Snipe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 20, 2007 · Niemeyer, Motz, Shedd
258 F. App'x 554

United States v. Snipe

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to compel the Government to file a substantial assistance motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Snipe, No. 2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1 (D.S.C. July 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.