McCollough v. O'Brien
McCollough v. O'Brien
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7091
SAMMIE LAMONT MCCOLLOUGH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00712-jct)
Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 19, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sammie Lamont McCollough, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Sammie Lamont McCollough, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2241(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See McCollough v. O’Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00712-
jct (W.D. Va. July 10, 2007).* We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The district court mistakenly referred to this action as one proceeding under
28 U.S.C. § 2254(2000) in its final order. We conclude this was a clerical error, as the court properly referred to the action as one pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241in its memorandum opinion.
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished