U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

McCollough v. O'Brien

McCollough v. O'Brien
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 19, 2007

McCollough v. O'Brien

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7091

SAMMIE LAMONT MCCOLLOUGH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00712-jct)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 19, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sammie Lamont McCollough, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sammie Lamont McCollough, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McCollough v. O’Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00712- jct (W.D. Va. July 10, 2007).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The district court mistakenly referred to this action as one proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) in its final order. We conclude this was a clerical error, as the court properly referred to the action as one pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in its memorandum opinion.

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.