U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Darden v. United States

Darden v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 18, 2007

Darden v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1867

FREDERICK DARDEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00428-REP)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 18, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Darden, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Frederick Darden appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Darden v. United States, No. 3:07-cv-00428-REP (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.