Moore v. Leavitt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Moore v. Leavitt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1372

NANCY F. MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL LEAVITT, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:04-cv-02819-WDQ)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norton C. Joerg, Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Jason D. Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nancy F. Moore appeals the district court’s orders

denying her motion to amend her complaint and granting Defendant

summary judgment on her employment discrimination and retaliation

claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm

substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Moore v. Thompson, No. 1:04-cv-02819-WDQ (D. Md. Feb. 9, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We have assumed for purposes of this appeal that the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White,

126 S. Ct. 2405

(2006) “adverse employment action” standard applies to retaliation claims brought by federal employees.

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished