Foreman v. Weinstein
Foreman v. Weinstein
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1398
TRUMILLA FOREMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALLEN WEINSTEIN, Doctor; NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:05-cv-03342-PJM)
Submitted: November 30, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Trumilla Foreman, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Neil Ray White, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Trumilla Foreman appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendants in her civil action.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Foreman v. Weinstein, No. 8:05-cv-03342-PJM (D. Md.
filed March 27, 2007; entered March 28, 2007). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished