Valentine v. Nettles
Valentine v. Nettles
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7234
RANDY L. VALENTINE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THIERRY D. NETTLES, Major at Lieber Correctional Institution, sued in his individual capacity; JOHN CUSACK, Doctor at Lieber Correctional Institution, sued in his individual capacity; JOHN DOES, Officers, sued in their individual capacities; JANE GARMANY, Nurse at Gilliam Psychiatric Hospital, sued in her individual capacity; ROBIN HANCOCK, Health Counsel, sued in her individual capacity; RICHARD FRIERSON, Doctor at Gilliam Psychiatric Hospital, sued in his individual capacity; BRIAN R. BLANTON, Doctor at Gilliam Psychiatric Hospital, sued in his individual capacity; JIM E. PAGE, Director-Hospital Administrator at Gilliam Psychiatric Hospital, sued in his individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (4:06-cv-02314-HMH)
Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 27, 2007
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy L. Valentine, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Randy L. Valentine appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Valentine v.
Nettles, No. 4:06-cv-02314-HMH (D.S.C. July 19, 2007). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished