Banks v. Johnson
Banks v. Johnson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6795
CHRISTOPHER BANKS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
GENE JOHNSON, Director of D.O.C.,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00988-LMB)
Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 27, 2007
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Banks, Appellant Pro Se. Alice T. Armstrong, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Christopher Banks seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2254(2000) petition. The
order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a
certificate of appealability. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by
demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any
assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is
debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by
the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v.
Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336-38(2003); Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000); Rose v. Lee,
252 F.3d 676, 683-84(4th Cir. 2001).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Banks
has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished