Williams v. Bassett

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit January 3, 2007

Williams v. Bassett, 211 F. App'x 234 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

James Edward Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Umesi, No. 5:05-ct-00539-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: James Edward WILLIAMS, Plaintiff—Appellant v. F.H. BASSETT, III, Doctor at Central Prison M. Curzan, Doctor at Central Prison M. Suma, Doctor at Central Prison Doctor Samidi Doctor Umesi, Defendants—Appellees
Status: Published