McGill v. Snyder

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
McGill v. Snyder, 214 F. App'x 330 (4th Cir. 2007)

McGill v. Snyder

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

James Michael McGill appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGill v. Snyder, No. 5:05-ct-00249-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
James Michael MCGILL, Plaintiff—Appellant v. George E. SNYDER David Farmer W. Branch R. Cherry B. Hedspeth T. Howell K. Dubose S. Dorsey G. Sexton J. Aguilar D. Goodman D.D. Douglas M. Young S.D. Stevenson C. Ward, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Published