Lane v. Wynne
Lane v. Wynne
218 F. App'x 262
Lane v. Wynne
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Bruce E. Lane appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lane v. Wynne, No. 8:04-cv-01051-PJM (D. Md. June 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.