United States v. Hopkins
United States v. Hopkins
223 F. App'x 218
United States v. Hopkins
Opinion of the Court
Sean Jervitt Hopkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for production of transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.