Johnson v. Suntrust Bank

In these consolidated appeals, Terence Keith Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing as frivolous his civil complaints raising a host of claims against numerous defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Johnson’s motions to amend his informal briefs, we deny his motion to file an amended complaint in No. 06-2310 and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. SunTrust Bank, Nos. 3:06-cv-00748-HEH; 3:07-cv-00001-JRS (E.D.Va. Dec. 8, 2006 & Jan. 8, 2007); Johnson v. Carsey-Warner Prod., No. 3:07~cv-00004 (E.D.Va. Jan. 8, 2007); Johnson v. Wal-Mart, Inc.., No. 3:06-cv-00804-JRS (E.D.Va. Jan. 5, 2007); Johnson v. Creekmoore, No. 3:06-cv-00811-JRS (E.D.Va. Jan. 5, 2007); Johnson v. Warren, No. 3:07-cv-00003-JRS (E.D.Va. Jan. 8, 2007); Johnson v. Groff, No. 3:06-cv-00826-JRS (E.D.Va. Jan. 5, 2007); Johnson v. Commonwealth of Va., Nos. 3:06-cv00846-JRS & 3:06-cv-00805-JRS (E.D. Va. Jan. 5 & 8, 2007); Johnson v. United States, No. 3:06-cv-00866-JRS (E.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2007); Johnson v. Southside Reg’l Med. Ctr., No. 3:06-cv-00816-JRS (E.D.Va. Jan. 5, 2007); Johnson v. Thigpen, No. 3:06-cv-00827-JRS (E.D.Va. Dec. 20, 2006); Johnson v. Hoffman Commc’ns, Inc., No. 3:06-cv-00847-JRS (E.D.Va. Jan. 8, 2007); Johnson v. Haulers Ins. Co., No. 3:06-cv-00867-JRS (E.D.Va. Jan. 8, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.