Cyrus v. U.S. Marshals

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Cyrus v. U.S. Marshals, 249 F. App'x 969 (4th Cir. 2007)

Cyrus v. U.S. Marshals

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Edward Cyrus appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cyrus v. U.S. Marshals, No. 8:05-cv-01384-HFF, 2007 WL 809608 (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Clarence Edward CYRUS, Plaintiff—Appellant v. U.S. MARSHALS, OF COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA Thurmond Federal Courthouse Lexington County Detention Center, Officials Federal Bureau of Prisons United States of America John Radney, United States Marshals Service John Doe, 1, United States Marshals Service John Doe, 2, United States Marshals Service, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Published