Swart v. Johnson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Swart v. Johnson, 254 F. App'x 207 (4th Cir. 2007)

Swart v. Johnson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Hamilton H. Swart, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order advising him that he had the right to file affidavits or other material contesting the application of the statute of limitations in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) proceeding. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Swart seeks to appeal is neither *208a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Hamilton H. SWART, III v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director, Respondent—Appellee
Status
Published