Egbunike v. Keisler

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Egbunike v. Keisler, 254 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2007)

Egbunike v. Keisler

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Nkem Egbunike, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its *227discretion in denying Egbunike’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1008.2(a) (2007); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Egbunike, No. A76-590-438 (B.I.A. May 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Nkem EGBUNIKE, a/k/a Nkem Anya v. Peter D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General
Status
Published