Reid v. Knarf Investments

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 28, 2007

Reid v. Knarf Investments, 255 F. App'x 743 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

James E. Reid appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his appeals from the bankruptcy court and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reid v. Knarf Investments, Nos. l:06-cv-02582BEL; BK-01-50422 (D. Md. Apr. 5, 2007; Apr. 17, 2007; Apr. 30, 2007; May 18, 2007).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reid has filed a motion to incorporate a decision of the bankruptcy court that was entered after he noted this appeal. We deny the motion but have forwarded it the district court to be docketed as a notice of appeal of the September 28, 2007, order pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 4(d).

Reference

Full Case Name: In re: James E. REID, Debtor. James E. Reid, Debtor—Appellant v. Knarf Investments, Creditor—Appellee, and Ellen W. Cosby, Trustee
Status: Published