U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Moss v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 5, 2007 · Hamilton, King, Traxler

257 F. App'x 633

Counsel

Daniel Moss, Appellant Pro Se. Lora M. Taylor, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Hilaire v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2022)
Williams v. Kendall (District Court, D. Maryland 2022)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Moss appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moss v. United States, No. 7:06-cv-00051-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.