Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corporation
Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corporation
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1287
GARY D. HICKS; CLYDE CASEY; JEAN CASEY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:06-cv- 02195-RWT)
Submitted: November 30, 2007 Decided: January 7, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
M. Albert Figinski, John A. Pica, Jr., Michael W. Reed, Thomas P. Kelly, LAW OFFICES OF PETER G. ANGELOS, PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Brian L. Moffet, GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER & HOLLANDER, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Gary Hicks, Clyde Casey, and Jean Casey appeal the
district court’s order denying their motion to remand and granting
Wilshire Credit Corporation’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to
dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on
appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court at the hearing held on
February 26, 2007. Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corp., No. 8:06-cv-
02195-RWT) (D. Md. Feb. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished