Amaram v. Virginia State University
Amaram v. Virginia State University
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1278
DONATUS I. AMARAM, Ph.D.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; W. ERIC THOMAS, Ph.D., In his Official Capacity as Provost,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00444-JRS)
Submitted: December 14, 2007 Decided: January 7, 2008
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Marcus Scriven, SCRIVEN LAW OFFICES, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General of Virginia, William Cleveland Mims, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Maureen Riley Matsen, Deputy Attorney General, Sydney E. Rab, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Donatus I. Amaram appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his claims of discrimination, retaliation, violation of
due process, and breach of contract against his employer Virginia
State University and its Provost. We have reviewed the briefs and
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Amaram v. Virginia
State University, No. 3:06-cv-00444-JRS (E.D. Va. Sept. 14, 2006
and Feb. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished