Mullins v. United States
Mullins v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7361
RONNIE MULLINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; RICHARD RAMIREZ; E. MACE; MARK DIB; SALVATORE LANASE; KAREN LAMBRIGHT; JANET BUNTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (1:06-cv-00105)
Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 25, 2008
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Mullins, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia; William Eugene Galeota, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ronnie Mullins appeals the district court’s order
adopting the report of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
Mullins’ complaint asserting deliberate indifference to medical
needs and medical negligence pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388(1971), and
the Federal Tort Claims Act,
28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680(2000). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Mullins v. United States, No. 1:06-cv-00105 (N.D.W. Va.
Aug. 30, 2007). We deny Mullins’ motion for leave to proceed on
appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished