Barkley v. Pierce
Barkley v. Pierce
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7316
EMMETT BARKLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SERGEANT PIERCE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHANK; DAN DEVAROE, Correctional Officer II,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:07- cv-01974-JFM)
Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 25, 2008
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emmett Barkley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Emmett Barkley appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
the reasons stated by the district court. Barkley v. Pierce, No.
1:07-cv-01974-JFM (D. Md., Aug. 21, 2007). We further deny as moot
Barkley’s motion for expedited adjudication of this appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished