Holtzman v. Shearin
Holtzman v. Shearin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7261
TODD NEIL HOLTZMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; FRANK B. BISHOP; GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary; TICHNELL, Classification Department; CROWE, Classification Department; ATTORNEY GENERAL; JEFFREY NINES; THOMAS K. WOLFE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (07-1473-WDQ)
Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 24, 2008
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Todd Neil Holtzman, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Todd Neil Holtzman appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holtzman v.
Shearin, No. 07-1473-WDQ (D. Md. Aug. 8, 2007). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished