Holtzman v. Shearin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Holtzman v. Shearin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7261

TODD NEIL HOLTZMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; FRANK B. BISHOP; GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary; TICHNELL, Classification Department; CROWE, Classification Department; ATTORNEY GENERAL; JEFFREY NINES; THOMAS K. WOLFE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (07-1473-WDQ)

Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 24, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Todd Neil Holtzman, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Todd Neil Holtzman appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holtzman v.

Shearin, No. 07-1473-WDQ (D. Md. Aug. 8, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished