U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

Holtzman v. Shearin

Holtzman v. Shearin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 24, 2008

Holtzman v. Shearin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7261

TODD NEIL HOLTZMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; FRANK B. BISHOP; GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary; TICHNELL, Classification Department; CROWE, Classification Department; ATTORNEY GENERAL; JEFFREY NINES; THOMAS K. WOLFE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (07-1473-WDQ)

Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 24, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Todd Neil Holtzman, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Todd Neil Holtzman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holtzman v. Shearin, No. 07-1473-WDQ (D. Md. Aug. 8, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.