United States v. Wooten

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Wooten

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7392

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALONZO N. WOOTEN, a/k/a Cut Wooten,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:99-cr-00006-JBF)

Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 28, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alonzo N. Wooten, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alonzo N. Wooten appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for specific performance of his plea agreement.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. Wooten, No. 4:99-cv-00006-JBF

(E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished