Clapp v. Potter
Opinion
Pamela G. Clapp appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clapp v. Potter, No. l:06-cv-01070-NCT (M.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Pamela G. CLAPP, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service, Defendant—Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished