De Leon v. Mukasey
De Leon v. Mukasey
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1080
MALEVIS E. DE LEON,
Petitioner,
versus
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A95-833-382)
Submitted: January 11, 2008 Decided: February 14, 2008
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederic W. Schwartz, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Leslie McKay, Senior Litigation Counsel, Lindsay B. Glauner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Malevis E. De Leon, a native and citizen of Columbia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration
judge’s denial of her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We
have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the
Board did not abuse its discretion in upholding the denial of De
Leon’s motion. See
8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1)(iv) (2007).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated
by the Board. See In re: De Leon, No. A95-833-382 (B.I.A. Jan. 17,
2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished