Holman v. Clemson University
Holman v. Clemson University
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1898
ROSLYN HOLMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:05-cv-02727-TLW)
Submitted: January 29, 2008 Decided: February 12, 2008
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roslyn Holman, Appellant Pro Se. James William Logan, Jr., LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, L.L.P., Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Roslyn Holman appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in her employment
discrimination action alleging retaliation. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Holman v. Clemson
University, No. 4:05-cv-02727-TLW (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2007). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished