U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

Antle v. Johanns

Antle v. Johanns
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 12, 2008

Antle v. Johanns

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1396

BHAGAVAN ANTLE, d/b/a The Institute for Greatly Endangered and Rare Species (T.I.G.E.R.S.), Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MIKE JOHANNS, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of America, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 07-1557

BHAGAVAN ANTLE, d/b/a The Institute for Greatly Endangered and Rare Species (T.I.G.E.R.S.), Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MIKE JOHANNS, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of America, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:06-cv-01008-TLW) Submitted: January 30, 2008 Decided: February 12, 2008

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond C. Fischer, William S. Duncan, DUNCAN, CROSBY & MARING, LLC, Georgetown, South Carolina, for Appellant. Reginald I. Lloyd, United States Attorney, Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bhagavan Antle appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for preliminary injunction and summary judgment and granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Antle v. Johanns, No. 4:06-cv-01008-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 1 & June 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.