Reese v. Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives
Opinion
Willie Reese appeals the district court’s order dismissing Reese’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reese v. Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives, No. 3:07-cv-00308-GCM, 2007 WL 2288140 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Willie REESE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES; Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department; Charlotte Narcotic Agency, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished