Brillhart v. Ragland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Brillhart v. Ragland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7053

RICHARD EDWARD BRILLHART,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VINCENT RAGLAND; TIM AMICO; PATRICIA STANSBERRY; JENNIFER JONES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-ct-03073-H)

Submitted: January 24, 2008 Decided: February 11, 2008

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Edward Brillhart, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Edward Brillhart appeals the district court’s

order dismissing under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B) (2000) his

complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brillhart v.

Ragland, No. 5:07-ct-03073-H (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2007). We deny all

pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished