Brillhart v. Ragland
Brillhart v. Ragland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7053
RICHARD EDWARD BRILLHART, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
VINCENT RAGLAND; TIM AMICO; PATRICIA STANSBERRY; JENNIFER JONES, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-ct-03073-H)
Submitted: January 24, 2008 Decided: February 11, 2008
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Edward Brillhart, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Richard Edward Brillhart appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brillhart v. Ragland, No. 5:07-ct-03073-H (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2007). We deny all pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.