UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6864

JOHN D. SIMPSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairperson of the Virginia Parole Board; DAVID N. HARKER, Vice-Chairman, Virginia Parole Board; CAROL A. SIEVERS, Member of the Virginia Parole Board; HERBERT V. COULTON, Member of the Virginia Parole Board; MICHAEL M. HAWES, Member of the Virginia Parole Board; THURGOOD MARSHALL, Director, Public Safety; ROBERT P. CROUCH, JR., Deputy Secretary of Public Safety; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; JAMES O. YOUNT, Probation and Parole Officer; DORIS L. EWING, Senior Manager Court and Legal Services, Virginia Department of Corrections; JIM SISK, Manager, Classification Court and Legal Unit, Virginia Department of Corrections; GARY BASS, Chief of Operations, Classification and Record, Virginia Department of Corrections; WILLIAM P. ROGERS, Regional Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center; TOM NEUMAYER, Assistant Warden of Programs, Powhatan Correctional Center; J. JACOBS, Institutional Counselor, Powhatan Correctional Center, in their Official and Individual Capacities,

Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cv-00611-REP)

Submitted: January 31, 2008 Decided: February 19, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John D. Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

John D. Simpson appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his

(2000) complaint and his

motions filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Simpson v. Fahey,

No. 3:04-cv-00611-REP (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 28, 2006 & entered

Mar. 29, 2006; Mar. 27, 2007; Apr. 27, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -