King v. Marriott International
King v. Marriott International
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1880
TERRY S. KING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (9:05-cv-01774-PMD)
Submitted: February 11, 2008 Decided: February 29, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry S. King, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Montgomery Shetterly, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Terry King appeals the district court’s orders adopting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant summary judgment to
Marriott International, Inc. on King’s claim of retaliation under
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967,
29 U.S.C. §§ 621-
634 (2000), and on King’s state law contract claims. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See King v.
Marriott Int’l, Inc., No. 9:05-cv-01774-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. 3, June
19, and Aug. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished