King v. Marriott International

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

King v. Marriott International

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1880

TERRY S. KING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (9:05-cv-01774-PMD)

Submitted: February 11, 2008 Decided: February 29, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry S. King, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Montgomery Shetterly, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Terry King appeals the district court’s orders adopting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant summary judgment to

Marriott International, Inc. on King’s claim of retaliation under

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967,

29 U.S.C. §§ 621

-

634 (2000), and on King’s state law contract claims. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See King v.

Marriott Int’l, Inc., No. 9:05-cv-01774-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. 3, June

19, and Aug. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished