Young v. Barthlow
Opinion
Clayton E. Young appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants on his complaint that alleged violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2000), and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 504 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Barthlow, No. 8:07-cv-00662-RWT (D.Md. Nov. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Clayton E. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephanie BARTHLOW, Facility Administrator; Jack Cragway, Warden; Sally Davis, Head Case Manager; Dennis Lagentry, Case Manager; Teresa Laviano, Case Manager, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished