Spencer v. Elmore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Spencer v. Elmore, 266 F. App'x 307 (4th Cir. 2008)

Spencer v. Elmore

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rickey Nelson Spencer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spencer v. Elmore, No. 5:07-cv-00055-MU, 2007 WL 1652263 (W.D.N.C. June 7, 2007). We further deny Spencer’s motion for discovery. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Rickey Nelson SPENCER, Plaintiff—Appellant, and Sheena Spencer, Plaintiff, v. Terry ELMORE; David Privette, Sergeant; Lieutenant Meyer; Sergeant Hawkins; Roderick M. Wright, Attorney; W. Erwin Spainhour, Judge; Christopher M. Collier; Jim Elmore; Iredell County; State of North Carolina, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Unpublished