Cruz v. Doe
Cruz v. Doe
266 F. App'x 307
Cruz v. Doe
Opinion
Marco Antonio Cruz appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cruz v. Doe, No. 3:07-cv-327-03-MU, 2007 WL 2344810 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.